![]() I find that interesting because weren't the Class of '59 models supposed to be Heritage's answer to the Gibson '59 reissues? And didn't Gibson use a long tenon in '59? You'da thunk Heritage would have used that construction method for that run. ![]() I checked my tenon on the H150 Class of '59 last night. But I love each of my Gibsons for what they are, not disliking them for what they aren't. So to my ear the Heritage has an unfair advantage in a head to head comparison. I believe (for my tastes anyway) that limba is sonicly superior to mahogany. You would think it sounded Les Paulish.Īnd I don't feel it's fair to compare my Gibsons to my Heritage because the my Heritage has a limba neck and back as apposed to mahogany. You wouldn't listen to the Heritage and say it sounds like a Strat or a Tele or a Gretch. They are all in the same sonic ballpark though. ![]() And that's saying something because I feel I have some exceptional sounding Gibsons. Yea, my H150 doesn't sound exactly like any of my Les Pauls. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |